Josiah Strong, a Protestant clergyman and author of "Our Country: Its Possible Future and Its Present Crisis (1885)" was a prominent leader in the movement to apply Darwinist principles to society (Social Darwinism). He, along with others like Herbert Spencer, Theodore Roosevelt, and Henry Cabot Lodge believed that the Anglo-Saxon race (basically those english-speaking descendants of western europe) was superior and was destined (in fact they almost felt it was his duty)to rule the world or a large portion of it. Carefully read the handout: Josiah Strong on Anglo-Saxon Predominance (1891) and answer the following questions:
1) What is Strong's overall message?
2) Would you consider Strong to be a racist?
3) What motivations would Strong have to promote his message? What are his
goals as a representative of the Protestant Church?
Remember to respond to at least two of your classmates posts!
Josiah Strong on Anglo-Saxon Predominance, 1891
________________________________________
It is not necessary to argue to those for whom I write that the two great needs of mankind, that all men may be lifted up into the light of the highest Christian civilization, are, first, a pure, spiritual Christianity, and second, civil liberty. Without controversy, these are the forces which, in the past, have contributed most to the elevation of the human race, and they must continue to be, in the future, the most efficient ministers to its progress. It follows, then, that the Anglo-Saxon, as the great representative of these two ideas, the depositary of these two greatest blessings, sustains peculiar relations to the world's future, is divinely commissioned to be, in a peculiar sense, his brother's keeper. Add to this the fact of his rapidly increasing strength in modem times, and we have well-nigh a demonstration of his destiny. In 1700 this race numbered less than 6,000,000 souls. In 1800, Anglo-Saxons (I use the term somewhat broadly to include all English speaking peoples) had increased to about 20,500,000, and now, in 1890, they number more than 120,000,000, having multiplied almost six-fold in ninety years. At the end of the reign of Charles 11, the English colonists in America numbered 200,000. During these two hundred years, our population has increased two hundred and fifty-fold. And the expansion of this race has been no less remarkable than its multiplication. In one century the United States has increased its territory ten-fold, while the enormous acquisition of foreign territory by Great Britain-and chiefly within the last hundred years-is wholly unparalleled in history. This mighty Anglo-Saxon race, though comprising only one-thirteenth part of mankind, now rules more than one-third of the earth's surface, and more than one-fourth of its people. And if this race, while growing from 6,000,000 to 120,000,000, thus gained possession of a third portion of the earth, is it to be supposed that when it numbers 1,000,000,000, it will lose the disposition, or lack the power to extend its sway? ...
America is to have the great preponderance of numbers and of wealth, and by the logic of events will follow the scepter of controlling influence. This will be but the consummation of a movement as old as civilization--a result to which men have looked forward for centuries. John Adams records that nothing was "more ancient in his memory than the observation that arts, sciences and empire had traveled westward; and in conversation it was always added that their next leap would be over the Atlantic into America." He recalled a couplet that had been inscribed or rather drilled, into a rock on the shore of Monument Bay in our old colony of Plymouth:
The Eastern nations sink, their glory ends,
And empire rises where the sun descends. . .
Mr. Darwin is not only disposed to see, in the superior vigor of our people, an illustration of his favorite theory of natural selection, but even intimates that the world's history thus far has been simply preparatory for our future, and tributary to it. He says: "There is apparently much truth in the belief that the wonderful progress of the United States, as well as the character of the people, are the results of natural selection; for the more energetic, restless, and courageous men from all parts of Europe have emigrated during the last ten or twelve generations to that great country, and have there succeeded best. Looking at the distant future, I do not think that the Rev. Mr. Zincke takes an exaggerated view when he says: 'All other series of events-as that which resulted in the culture of mind in Greece, and that which resulted in the Empire of Rome-only appear to have purpose and value when viewed in connection with, or rather as subsidiary to, the great stream of Anglo-Saxon emigration to the West.' "
There is abundant reason to believe that the Anglo-Saxon race is to be, is, indeed, already becoming, more effective here than in the mother country. The marked superiority of this race is due, in large measure, to its highly mixed origin. Says Rawlinson: "It is a general rule, now almost universally admitted by ethnologists, that the mixed races of mankind are superior to the pure ones"; and adds: "Even the Jews, who are so often cited as an example of a race at once pure and strong, may, with more reason, be adduced on the opposite side of the argument." The ancient Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Romans, were all mixed races. Among modem races, the most conspicuous example is afforded by the Anglo-Saxons.... There is here a new commingling of races; and, while the largest injections of foreign blood are substantially the same elements that constituted the original Anglo-Saxon admixture, so that we may infer the general type will be preserved, there are strains of other bloods being added, which, if Mr. Emerson's remark is true, that "the best nations are those most widely related," may be expected to improve the stock, and aid it to a higher destiny. If the dangers of immigration, which have been pointed out, can be successfully met for the next few years, until it has passed its climax, it may be expected to add value to the amalgam which will constitute the new Anglo-Saxon race of the New World. Concerning our future, Herbert Spencer says: "One great result is, I think, tolerably clear. From biological truths it is to be inferred that the eventual mixture of the allied varieties of the Aryan race, forming the population, will produce a more powerful type of man than has hitherto existed, and a type of man more plastic, more adaptable, more capable of undergoing the modifications needful for complete social life. I think, whatever difficulties they may have to surmount, and whatever tribulations they may have to pass through, the Americans may reasonably look forward to a time when they will have produced a civilization grander than any the world has known."
It may be easily shown, and is of no small significance, that the two great ideas of which the Anglo-Saxon is the exponent are having a fuller development in the United States than in Great Britain. There the union of Church and State tends strongly to paralyze some of the members of the body of Christ. Here there is no such influence to destroy spiritual life and power. Here, also, has been evolved the form of government consistent with the largest possible civil liberty. Furthermore, it is significant that the marked characteristics of this race are being here emphasized most. Among the most striking features of the Anglo-Saxon is his money-making power a power of increasing importance in the widening commerce of the world's future. We have seen . . . that, although England is by far the richest nation of Europe, we have already outstripped her in the race after wealth, and we have only begun the development of our vast resources.
Again, another marked characteristic of the Anglo-Saxon is what may be called an instinct or genius for colonizing. His unequaled energy, his indomitable perseverance, and his personal independence, made him a pioneer. He excels all others in pushing his way into new countries. It was those in whom this tendency was strongest that came to America, and this inherited tendency has been further developed by the westward sweep of successive generations across the continent. So noticeable has this characteristic become that English visitors remark it. Charles Dickens once said that the typical American would hesitate to enter heaven unless assured that he could go farther west.
Again, nothing more manifestly distinguishes the Anglo-Saxon than his intense and persistent energy, and he is developing in the United States an energy which, in eager activity and effectiveness, is peculiarly American.
This is due partly to the fact that Americans are much better fed than Europeans, and partly to the undeveloped resources of a new country, but more largely to our climate, which acts as a constant stimulus. Ten years after the landing of the Pilgrims, the Rev. Francis Higginson, a good observer, wrote: "A sup of New England air is better than a whole flagon of English ale." Thus early had the stimulating effect of our climate been noted. Moreover, our social institutions are stimulating. In Europe the various ranks of society are, like the strata of the earth, fixed and fossilized. There can be no great change without a terrible upheaval, a social earthquake. Here society is like the waters of the sea, mobile; as General Garfield said, and so signally illustrated in his own experience, that which is at the bottom to-day may one day flash on the crest of the highest wave. Every one is free to become whatever he can make of himself; free to transform himself from a rail splitter or a tanner or a canal-boy, into the nation's President. Our aristocracy, unlike that of Europe, is open to all comers. Wealth, position, influence, are prizes offered for energy; and every farmer's boy, every apprentice and clerk, every friendless and penniless immigrant, is free to enter the lists. Thus many causes co-operate to produce here the most forceful and tremendous energy in the world.
What is the significance of such facts? These tendencies enfold the future; they are the mighty alphabet with which God writes his prophecies. May we not, by a careful laying together of the letters, spell out something of his meaning? It seems to me that God, with infinite wisdom and skill, is training the Anglo-Saxon race for an hour sure to come in the world's future. Heretofore there has always been in the history of the world a comparatively unoccupied land westward, into which the crowded countries of the East have poured their surplus populations. But the widening waves of migration, which millenniums ago rolled east and west from the valley of the Euphrates, meet to-day on our Pacific coast. There are no more new worlds. The unoccupied arable lands of the earth are limited, and will soon be taken. The time is coming when the pressure of population on the means of subsistence will be felt here as it is now felt in Europe and Asia. Then will the world enter upon a new stage of its history-the final competition of races, for which the Anglo-Saxon is being schooled. Long before the thousand millions are here, the mighty centrifugal tendency, inherent in this stock and strengthened in the United States, will assert itself. Then this race of unequaled energy, with all the majesty of numbers and the might of wealth behind it-the representative, let us hope, of the largest liberty, the purest Christianity, the highest civilization-having developed peculiarly aggressive traits calculated to impress its institutions upon mankind, will spread itself over the earth. If I read not amiss, this powerful race will move down upon Mexico, down upon Central and South America, out upon the islands of the sea, over upon Africa and beyond. And can any one doubt that the results of this competition of races will be the "survival of the fittest?" "Any people," says Dr. Bushnell, "that is physiologically advanced in culture, though it be only in a degree beyond another which is mingled with it on strictly equal terms, is sure to live down and finally live out its inferior. Nothing can save the inferior race but a ready and pliant assimilation. Whether the feebler and more abject races are going to be regenerated and raised up, is already, very much of a question. What if it should be God's plan to people the world with better and finer material?"
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
72 comments:
Reverend Josiah Strong emphasizes that the Anglo-Saxon race within the U.S. is one that is superior. In addition he seems to promote imperialism and the race at the same time in which he claims that the Anglo Saxon race is known for its expansion of commerce to world. In my opinion and due to the text, I believe that he is not racist in an extreme, because he believes that mixed races are superior to pure ones. However the belief of superiority for a certain race is an element of racism. Also, according to his book Our Country: It’s possible future and Its Present Crisis, he promoted the reconciliation to end racial conflict. Motivations that support his message are his promotions to extend domestic missionary activity in the American West and to solve social ills through protestant religious principles.
Strong’s overall message had mostly to do with the Anglo-Saxon race being prominent within the US in a way that was more beneficial to the mother country than Anglo-Saxons’ Protestant movements and expansion within the mother country itself. I believe that Strong is not “full blown” racist because it does not seem to have animosity towards any other race. However, he does believe that mixed races are superior to pure ones, which would make Strong’s racism views very controversial. He would support his message through his promoted views to end conflict that has to do with race. His goals as a representative to the Protestant church would have to do with the expansion of missionary movments westward as well as the use of religious beliefs to cure social conflicts.
I agree with Lil Chris (the only comment posted right now =P) in saying that Strong’s goals were to solve social ills through protestant religious principles.
jayaguilar86 is the only person i can reply to due to the lack of participation of students replying to the blog LOL!!!!!
i agree with jayagular86, in which we believe that Strongs message had some form of praising the Anglo Saxon race. In addition i agree with his view of Strong not being a "full blown" racist.
The base of Strong's overall message is the preservation of the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race within the U.S. spread from Europe. He continues to support his theory that the Anglo-Saxons are outnumbering the minority and is always continuing to grow, thus expanding the idea of imperialism across America. In a sense, racism is defined by hatred or intolerance of another race or other races. While Strong glorified the Anglo-Saxons, he never mentioned discrimination towards other race. He did not specificially looked down upon the minority races in his eyes, he just emphasized the Anglo-Saxon's and their significance upon this Earth. Also, like "lil chris" mentioned, Strong vitalized the end to racial conflict in his book, "Our Country: Its' possible future and Its Present Crisis". Strong's motivation lies within Darwin's Social Darwinisim. It is by natural selection that the Anglo Saxon's are destined to emigrate to the American West to reveal their message and to do missionary work. Strong, as a representative of the Protestant Church, he belives the hand of God is guiding the Anglo-Saxons to emigrate and prosper throughout American and further.
In my opinion, Reverend Josiah Strong believes that the Anglo-Saxon race should be preserved as the most superior of all the other races in the United States. Strong believed that the marked superiority of the race was due to the highly mixed origins of this race. In addition, Strong proposed the fact that the Anglo-Saxon race, known for its expansion in commerce, is becoming more effective in the United States than in the mother country. In my opinion, Strong is NOT a racist because, unlike racist people, Strong does not support a particular race. On the other hand, he actually supports a race that is of many varieties. In addition, Strong, unlike a racist, did not look down upon any other races, but simply promoted his own. In accordance with mondile, I believe that Strong's motivation lies within Social Darwinism. This belief states that natural selction will make the Anglo-Saxon race immigrate to the US and make the mmore prosporous than any other race. Lastly, I agree with jayaguilar86 that Strong's goals as a representative to the Protestant church would have to do with the expansion of missionary movments westward as well as the use of protestant religious beliefs to cure social ills.
Strong is basically advocating that the Anglo-Saxon race in the United States is superior to that of Europe and the rest of the world. Strong could be considered a racist due to his belief that one race is better than any other but he does not showcase open hostility towards any particular race. Strong wrote his book at a time when Americans were doing extremely well and prospering and so he was able to come up with his theory. His goals as representative of the Protestant Church was to spread the religion westward through missionary activities and advocate social ideas through the Protestant religion.
I agree with lil chris regarding Strong being somewhat of a racist. He clearly believed that the Anglo-Saxon race in the US was "superior" to any other and so he could be considered racist. However, he did not openly suggest violence and hostility toward any other race.
I also agree with jayaguilar86 regarding Strong's goals to expand the Protestant faith westward and spread his ideas of social interaction and Darwinism.
1. Strong believes that the Anglo-Saxon race is superior because it represents spiritual Christine-ality and civil liberty, both of which have contributed greatly to the elevation of the human race. Because of this, the Anglo-Saxon race is therefore destined to control the majority of the world. Due to imperialism, he explains that the race is continuously expanding and outnumbering the minority. Strong says that the "Strong" people came to America making America, according to Darwinism, the country with the "fittest" of them all.
2. We believe that Strong is not a racist for he does not look down upon any particular race. He only emphasizes the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race. Strong believes that a hybrid race is better than a pure race, which Jay says goes against the Harry Potter concept that Purebloods are better Mudbloods. A racist person would never believe that a hybrid race is superior to a pure one, leading to the fact that Strong is not racist, unlike Malfoy.
3. Motivations that would promote Strong's message include extending missionary activity in the American West to solve social problems through protestant religious concepts.
We agree with Mondi in that Strong should not be considered a racist because he does not look down upon any single race.
In addition, we agree with Aditya on the idea of the westward movement as one of Strong's movement.
By: Jay Patel
Christine Wang because her computer got thrown out the window so unplanned she came over to work and we started to work on it.
1. Strong believes that the Anglo-Saxon race is superior because it represents spiritual Christine-ality and civil liberty, both of which have contributed greatly to the elevation of the human race. Because of this, the Anglo-Saxon race is therefore destined to control the majority of the world. Due to imperialism, he explains that the race is continuously expanding and outnumbering the minority. Strong says that the "Strong" people came to America making America, according to Darwinism, the country with the "fittest" of them all.
2. We believe that Strong is not a racist for he does not look down upon any particular race. He only emphasizes the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race. Strong believes that a hybrid race is better than a pure race, which Jay says goes against the Harry Potter concept that Purebloods are better Mudbloods. A racist person would never believe that a hybrid race is superior to a pure one, leading to the fact that Strong is not racist, unlike Malfoy.
3. Motivations that would promote Strong's message include extending missionary activity in the American West to solve social problems through protestant religious concepts.
We agree with Mondi in that Strong should not be considered a racist because he does not look down upon any single race.
In addition, we agree with Aditya on the idea of the westward movement as one of Strong's movement.
By: Jay Patel
Christine Wang because her computer got thrown out the window so unplanned she came over to work and we started to work on it.
Strong's overall message mainly is about how the Anglo-Saxon race has had many more accomplishments in the U.S. than it has had in Europe. Basically giving the message that this race should be/is the superior race. Therefore he states that the Anglo-Saxon race is the surpassing race not only because of its accopmlishments but because of its diversity. In my opinion he is not completely racist because he actually doesnt look down on other races. But on the other hand his belief that the "Anglo-Saxon" race is superior makes him somewhat racist. Racism is defined as "the idea that one's own race is superior" which does fit Strong's beiefs. But then again he does not have "hatred or intolerance of another race or other races" which is also another defenition of racist/racism. The main motivation that is seen is that of "social darwinism." Strong believes that the Anglo-Saxons were destined to a westward movement in order to amplify missionary work which was his main goal. Basically going back to such cases as "Manifest Destiny" and "Robber baron justification." That they were pre-destined by God or by Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection, in other words, "survival of the fittest."
i agree with "lil chris" about his statement that Strong's belief of "superiority for a certain race is an element of racism." I also agree with "jayaguilar86" dealing with the same issue that "he does believe that mixed races are superior to pure ones, which would make Strong’s racism views very controversial."
Interestingly enough, it seems that Josiah Strong's primary goal in this message is to praise and promote the Anglo-Saxon race by a series of events that showed its greatness. Such as America's most dominant form of civil liberties and its progress to continually out-pace Great Britain in their game to gain extreme wealth.
As far as racism goes in this message, it is only limited to the fact that Josiah continually praises Anglo-Saxons. My opinion, however, is completely opposite from racism. Josiah Strong clearly clarifies that a "mixed" race is stronger than a pure race. Of course he's hinting at the immigration mixture into this great nation.
The last (and longest) paragraph of this message is what conveys his true purpose. He wants to show that our nation, the United States, is destined to take over every other country in this world and that the only way that people can survive is by assimilation. Strong emphasizes this notion by quoting Darwin's theory of "natural selection" and "survival of the fittest." He thinks that the United States is the fittest since the Anglo-Saxon is the main embodiment of this powerful mixture race that will take over the world.
I somewhat disagree with Norma Garcia. Reason why is that I believe that Strong does mention that the Anglo-Saxon in America is stronger than that in Great Britain but he also mentions that Great Britain is still hailed as controlling many lands in the world. Again, Strong makes a reference to the mixture of races, which is what America thrives with.
Strong's goal was to claim that the Anglo-Saxon society was becoming greater than its European ancestry and all other powers in the world. He was claiming that the Anglo-Saxon race would eventually dominate most of the world once they had claimed another third of the world in land. I do not believe that Strong meant to make any part of his message racist, but only to relay his opinion of what could come to the world and what he thought would live to be. He does not denounce any other nations or powers, but only looks upon the Anglo-Saxon as an evergrowing power and race. However, I believe that his message was supported by also his job, which is a member of the Protestant Church. It seems he would use this message also to mix in the pushing force with spreading religion across the nation. Also with the fact that since he already believes in the power of the new West, he would be convinced to be proud of this new growing nation.
In response to mondile, I agree that a pushing force behind him putting this message out would be for the purpose of God guiding the Anglo-Saxons.
In response to Jay/Christine, I also agree that Strong did not purposely denounce any other races, and was only promoting his own.
I disagree with mondile. Josiah does not "want" to preserve Anglo-Saxon. Quite the opposite actually. He praises the mixture of races, so he is presumably saying that the Anglo-Saxon will exist in everyone, but will be dominant in everyone. When that happens, the world will be "assimilated." In essence, Josiah does not worry about the preservation, he thinks that the Anglo-Saxon will succeed with no interference.
Strong’s overall message is that the Anglo-Saxon race is superior over all the other races within the United States. Because of such superiority, they are supposedly the only ones that could “civilize and Christianize the world”. Although he continues to emphasize the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race, he never once discriminated against any other race. Thus, it would not make him a racist. The motivation for Strong to promote his message would be the theory of Social Darwinism. He believes that the Anglo-Saxons are destined to move westward in order to extend domestic missionary activities and to solve social problems through protestant religious principles.
I agree with lakers_117 in that Strong was influenced by the Americans’ prosperity. Because they were well off, it led him to believe that there must be a specific race that carried the Americans to such success.
I disagree with lil chris in which it was stated that Strong was promoting an end to racial conflict. If anything, this would have aroused the anger and offended many other races saying they weren’t capable of carrying America further along.
Josiah Strong was mostly about the power of the anglo saxon race and how great and superior it was. He also talks about preserving it over all the others. I don't think Strong was a racist to the full extent. He advocated the anglo saxon race which was a mix of races. So technically he wasn't racist, just a little narrow minded. Also, he didn't advocate a 'pure' race but a hybris or mixed one. His goals were to spread the protestant values westward through the anglo saxons and have them prosper. It would also in a way support his idea that this race was superior if they were to successfully settle the west and grow.
Reverend Strong's overall message consisted of him believing that the Anglo-Saxons were superior because they contributed to the "elevation of the human race". Strong uses the fact that the race has been rapidly increasing in population compared to other races, and how the Anglo-Saxons were known for expansion. I don't consider Strong an extreme racist, rather a person promoting his race. Not once in his book did he degrade or look down on another race. Also, he stated that, "The marked superiority of this race is due, in large measure, to its highly mixed origin". This is an example of how he believes that the other cultures help make a stronger place (probably referring to the melting pot of America). His message is supported by the fact that hes reaching to the the west through missionary activity.
I disagree jayaguilar86 saying that the his views could be controversial. Although he did believe that the Anglo-Saxons were superior, I think hes trying to say that the combination of the strengths of each culture produces a stronger unit.
I like jays comment on how Strong goes against the Harry Potter concept of purebloods and mudbloods.
Strong's overall messagefrom the passage is that the Anglo-saxon race in the US as being the most powerful and superior race that can control the US or even the world due to the population of the race as it rises and rises outnumbering the minority.
I wouldnt say that Strong is a racist because he didnt really mention any other race and looked down upon another race. all he talked about was the supriority of the Anglo-saxon race. The only thing that makes him look like a racist is when he mentions that the mixed race are more superior than the pure ones.
His goals and motivations were to spread the protestant values westward through the anglo saxons and have them prosper also by extending missionary activity in the American West to solve social problems through protestant religious concepts.
I agree with lil chris that STRONG is not racist in an extreme, because he believes that mixed races are superior to pure ones. However the belief of superiority for a certain race is an element of racism.
i also agree wtih patelz2000 that we believe that Strong is not a racist for he does not look down upon any particular race. He only emphasizes the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race.
Strong's overall messagefrom the passage is that the Anglo-saxon race in the US as being the most powerful and superior race that can control the US or even the world due to the population of the race as it rises and rises outnumbering the minority.
I wouldnt say that Strong is a racist because he didnt really mention any other race and looked down upon another race. all he talked about was the supriority of the Anglo-saxon race. The only thing that makes him look like a racist is when he mentions that the mixed race are more superior than the pure ones.
His goals and motivations were to spread the protestant values westward through the anglo saxons and have them prosper also by extending missionary activity in the American West to solve social problems through protestant religious concepts.
I agree with lil chris that STRONG is not racist in an extreme, because he believes that mixed races are superior to pure ones. However the belief of superiority for a certain race is an element of racism.
i also agree wtih patelz2000 that we believe that Strong is not a racist for he does not look down upon any particular race. He only emphasizes the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race.
Strong believes the Anglo-Saxon race is one of the most superior. He emphasizes that is it still expanding and growing, spreading the ideals of imperialism.
I would not label Strong as a racist because he's simply glorifying the Anglo-Saxon race, not putting other down directly. Racist would be degrading others and exemplifying his own. But instead, he actually just believes its superior to others, which isn't exactly racist.
Strong's purpose of this would be to missionize and promote domestic missionary activity in America.
i agree with Lil_chris about his motivations. they did want to promote the end of racial conflict, too.
i agree with jayaguilar86 about how hes not completely racist. there are certain basis of which someone can be called racist. strong cannot be called this, but maybe, proud.
Reverend Strong had very strong opinions and beliefs about the Anglo-Saxon race. Although reading the passage seemed to show how shallow Strong is and how he is so close minded about races. His overall message was to emphasize how superior the Anglo-Saxon race is compared to the other races. Also he was praising America for its expansion. I belive that Strong is a racist due to the fact that he clearly talks very highly of the Anglo-Saxon race and its superioity among other races. Strongs motivation for this message was to inform the people that Christianity is better and the Anglo-Saxon race is higher than anyother race. He wanted to spread religion westward and impose social ideas through the protestant religion.
I agree with aditya(lakers_117) that Strong was a racist but i disagree about showing hostility towards other races. i think that Strong does show somewhat of a superiority to other races and clearly puts them down in a direct and an indirect way throughtout his message.
I think that Strong's overal message was to promote the anglo-saxon race. He also wanted to expand the anglo saxon message to other countries or to minister other countries to save people. I would consider strong a racist because he believes that his rac is better than the other races. Although he does not fully admit that he is a racist, believing that one race is better is being racist to me.
I disagree with Lil Chris when he says that strong is not a racist. He is a racist to me.
I agreee with lakers_117 becaus I believe that Strong was a racist.
Josiah Strong's overall message is that the Anglo-Saxon race in the United States is superior to the other races in the world. Strong also promotes imperialism, and that democracy should be spread throughout the world. I don't think he is a racist, but showing that he is patriotic in nature. I don't think he has anything against a certain race, and is a political ideal rather than a racial issue. Strong never discriminated against any of the other races, either. I agree with what Lil Chris said about the happenings in his book, Our Country: It's possible future and its present crisis, that the motivations promoted domestic missionary activity. I also agree with what Jay Aguilar said about the goals of Protestant church and the westward movement.
In this passage, Josiah Strong is trying to promote the idea that the Anglo-Saxon in America is superior to Europeans and other race in the world. Such a proclamation about the greatness of the Anglo-Saxon people leads Strong to reason why the United States to imperialize other nations. Reasoning that the Americans are superior, he desires for the Anglo-Saxon people to help those weaker people and races in the countries. Although Strong may be denounced as a racist, his ideology can be attributed to the concept of jingoism, not racism. He is not a racist person because he does not convey any negative assertions toward any specific race or nation. Instead, he takes much pride in his Anglo-Saxon American people that he believes them to be the greatest of all races. To have such a high opinion of your race is normal in society. Strong does have a strong opinion of his fellow Americans but he does not show any hostility towards other races. Like any other Christian ministers of this time, he actually wants America’s greatness to help those weaker countries. Likewise, Strong makes it is duty to promote the idea of expanding the territory of the United States to show the power of America and to help those inferior people of the inferior countries. As a representative of the Protestant Church, he also makes it his goal to expand the influence of Christianity by colonizing areas for missionaries. Due to these reasons, Josiah Strong is a very imperialistic minister.
In response to lakers_117’s comment, I agree with the fact that Strong “did not openly suggest violence and hostility toward any other race.” But, I disagree with him for the fact that he/she thinks that Strong is a racist. I do not believe that Strong is a racist because he is not conveying any kind of negative attitude towards a certain race. Instead, he has a great pride in his country, due to jingoism, that he thinks that America is the most superior of all nations.
In response to kobe17’s comment, I agree with the fact that he states that the motive behind Strong’s purpose for imperialism can be attributed to International Darwinism. It is the idea of “survival of the fittest” between nations that Strong emphasizes the superiority of the American people.
Strong’s overall message is that the Anglo-Saxon race is superior due to the will of God. He does this by showing how the US has surpassed other mighty empires, like Britain. He even uses a quote from Rev. Francis Higginson that states that US “air” is superior to that of England. He also uses Social Darwinism to argue that the Anglo-Saxon race is “Fitter” so that is why they have the right to rule the Earth. I would consider him a racist because any form of thinking that you are superior to any other human being, in my opinion, is racism. I think his goals as a representative of the Protestant Church is to spread this philosophy to all people by using imperialism.
I disagree with JayAguilar86 when he states that Strong is not a racist because when you think that a certain group of people are superior to others then, that is racism.
I agree with lakers_117 when he says that Strong did not physically or directly say the Anglo-Saxon is a better than one certain race it’s the way he raves about the Anglo-Saxon superior mousy that makes him racist.
1) Josiah Strong describes the racial superiority and incredible evolution of the Anglo-Saxon race. His overall message is to display the reasons for Anglo-Saxon dominance in the world. He also denotes the future of the inferior races of Earth as opposed to the Anglo-Saxons; the only possible action that can save the inferior races from total "extinction" is rapid assimilation into Anglo-Saxon society.
2) Many times, while reading this excerpt, Strong's words caused me to chuckle. I do not believe him to be racist in the modern sense of the word (discrimination toward a race or several races). His beliefs are more along the lines of ethnocentrism. Also, he views the intermingling of other races into the Anglo-Saxon race as benificial, since it could create a sort of super-race that could dominate the world. An Anglo-Saxon godzilla, if you will. Now, in your opinion, is this being racist? No, I believe this to be rather along the lines of madness.
3) Strong, being an Anglo-Saxon himself, of course wants to promote his message to the world. Also, considering the fact that he is a representative of the Protestant Church (whose members are predominantly Anglo-Saxon), it is only meet that he should want other races to acknowledge the superiority of the race and even assimilate into it, thus becoming Protestant themselves and adding to the followers of the Church. Another element of Strong's motivation would be to spread the Protestant gospel across the earth in the form of missionaries; he would use his ethnocentristic ideals as a justification.
I agree with Patelz2000 on the fact that Srong's belief was contrary to the Harry Potter belief that purebloods were better than mudbloods. :D
I also agree with James Owns You :] on the fact that Srong wants to promote American imperialism on the basis of Anglo-Saxon superiority.
I also agree with James Owns You :] on DISAGREEING with Mondile in the statement that Strong's message is to preserve the Anglo-Saxon race. He does not mean to preserve it, but rather to improve and mold it into a SUPER RACE. Pretty InTeReStInG belief. ;D
Reverend Josiah Strongs overall purpose was to manifest that the anglo saxon race,is dominant and used his belief to expand the movement to apply Darwinist principles to society.In the article,he backs up his belief of a superior race.Stating that,i do believe he was racist.Being ignorant to other cultures,traditions,and races is technically slowing down the process of evolution,which is what Darwin was not about. Social darwinism,in this case,is what strong believed,and the racist ideals backed that up.
Motivations strong had to promote his ideas were to end racial conflict,yet point out this superior figure.Being a protestant reformer,he wouldve wanted to begin relegious reforms and end social disputes.
i disagree with "jayagular86", and how he stated that strong is not a full blown racist.
i agree with lil chris and how he stated,"motivations that support his message are his promotions to extend domestic missionary activity in the American West and to solve social ills through protestant religious principles."
I think Strong's overall message is that the Anglo-Saxon race and mankind in general should strive to better itself and other races to overcome many obstacles and dominate over the weak. I don't think that Strong is a racist, but instead a radical imperialist because he wants Americans to control weaker nations and make them stronger for our benefit. Stong is motivated by Darwin's theory of Natural selection and survival of the fittest because anyone who is strong and can survive shoul take advantage of this to overcome the weaker races. His goals as a Protestant are to follow God's plan to be strong and use their strength to spread a greater good in Christian ideals.
I agree with "norma_garcia_5" that Strong is not completely a racist.
I also agree with "obviouslymatt" because he says that Strong wanted Protestants to move West and spread their values to prosper.
After reading about strong, I can infer that Strong’s overall message consisted of him believing that the Anglo-Saxsons were superior; he believed this because of the “elevation of the human race”. Also he the Anglo-saxon race in the US was the most powerful race that controlled the US, mainly because of the population of the race; the population outnumbered the minority races.I don’t believe that Strong would be considered a racist, for the reason that he never did discriminate the other races. The motivation that strong promoted was the theory of Social Darwinism. He believed that the anglo saxtons, were destined to move westward to extend domestic missionary activities and to solve the social problems that existed.
i can agree with historykid16 because i dont believe that Strong was a racist.
I also agree with Lakers_117 with his/her opinion on the idea of the westward movement as one of Strong's movement
Josiah Strong's message was basically the ideals of social darwinism. He believed that through everything only the best of the best was being formed and left behind. There would be a form of "superior race" that would then roam the earth. In a way i believe he supported merchantilism and imperialism. Merchantilism to go out and make colonies that would benefit the mother country and imperialism because he believed that a superior race should be superior in wealth and power and etc. Although i do not believe he was racist purely for the sake of being racist. i think that he made allowances for those who could prove their worth and show that they were "superior", however, in his eyes no one could be as superior as the white man. Therefore leading to the thought that the "superior" race would be benefiting those around them by making them civilized. As a reverend i do believe that he was trying to spread his ideals of christianity, although people with those beliefs give christians a bad name. He was messing in affairs that didn't concern him and definitely wasn't respecting the customs and culture of those other populations.
in response to christine's *christi815* comment on how strong's belief runs parallel to the thought of purebloods and mudbloods. I thought about it and it makes sense. It does seem similar and is a good point
i don't know why, but reading jay's response *patelz2000* made me think of how the reverend's name fits his belief of social belief. The strong survive and his last name is strong? just thought that was interesting and other than that jay's comment that strong is different from malfoy...but malfoy after a while got over the whole mudblood/pureblood thing.. didn't he? i do agree that strong wasn't strongly and deadset racist.
^-^ Esther L. (3rd period)
Strong's overall message is that the Anglo-Saxon race is a superior race because its practices of spiritual Christianity and civil liberty which have greatly contributed to human race. This superiority is obtained by its diversity and accomplishments in the world such as the expansion of commerce and religion etc. I do not believe that Strong is a racist in the sense that he is prejudice to other people for he never advocates a hate or dislike to any certain race and also due to his belief that the Anglo-Saxon race, a mixed race is superior rather than believing in a pure race. Motivation in promoting this message would be to extend missionary activity in the American West to solve social problems using religious concepts.
Agree:
Kobe17(Koran)
I believe with karan on the basis that Strong did not support one particular race :)
Dylan Russell
per.3
Feb 3rd, 2008
Reverend Josiah Strong's main message was to emphasize the idea that he believed that the Anglo-Saxon race was superior to all others. He believed that they had accomplished a lot which led to the successes of the US. I do not belive that he was racist because the actual definiton of racism is hatred towards another group of people. Strong never puts another group down and he dows not have hatred towards another group of people. He does however believe that mixed races are more superior to pure ones. He would spread his message and be a representative of the Protestant Church through missionary activities.
I agree with jayaguilar86 when he says that Strong was not a full blown racist but some of his beliefs were controversial.
I also like the comment made by Jay about the idea about the purebloods and the mudbloods.
The overall message of Strong's Anglo-Saxon Predominance is basically that Anglo-Saxons (AKA all English speaking people's)are in fact the predominant race and they should rule the earth and run everything. He kind of uses the idea of nationalism but applies it to the anglo-saxon race instead of countries. Also, although there are some elements of racism ih some of Strong's ideas, I do not believe that Strong is a rascist. Yes, he does put the anglo-saxon race up on a pedestal and talks about how great his race is, but he never talks bad about any other race or tries to say that they are bad or worthless or anything like that. He just believes that his race is better (I am not saying that this is okay, i am just pointing out his belief!!) Next, being a leader of the protestant church, Strong's motivations for the promotion of the anglo-saxon race would be religious and have to do a lot with the church and the idea that God chose this particular race to run the world and keep everything in order.
I agree with mondile about the idea that Strong shouldn't really be considered a racist. We pretty much said the same thing that he is promoting his race but doesn't look down upon the other races.
I slightly disagree with norma_garcia_5 because she says that although Strong's beliefs do not 100% identify with the definition of racism, he is still pretty much racist. I disagree because Strong clearly stats that a mixed race would be much stronger than a pure one which says that we do need other races and he doesn't want to get rid of any races or hates any other race.
I believe Reverend Josiah Strong's overall message is the Anglo-Saxon race is better, superior to any other race. He also mentions the fact that the Anglo-Saxon is still getting better, expanding. It is spreading the ideas of imperialism. I would consider Strong a racist, but not a huge one. He does promote that the Anglo-Saxon is superior, but does put down one certain race, just believes one is better than all the others. Social Darwinism would be the way he promotes his message. Strong's main goal is to promote and try to get more people to do missionary work.
I agree with mondile, that person stated that racism is discriminating another race using hatred, and Strong never really does that. He is still some part of a racist.
I disagree with pastelz2000, they made the point that Stong is not a racist at all, however he does believe one race is better than all the others.
Strong's overall message is obviously that the Anglo-Saxon race is by far the most powerful, most superior race. He backs this up by stating how they have established their position in society through the development in the United States, their money-making power, and their instinct or genius for colonizing. Although I strongly consider Strong to be, not only racist, but imperialistic and ethnocentric, he justifies his point of view by stating that “our aristocracy, unlike that of Europe, is open to all comers. Wealth, position, influence, are prizes offered for energy; and every farmer's boy, every apprentice and clerk, every friendless and penniless immigrant, is free to enter the lists”. Nonetheless, he later brings up the idea of Social Darwinism and how although immigrants are welcome, God has already set the stage for the "fittest" to survive.
As a representative of the Protestant Church, Strong is motivated by the extension of missionary activity in the American West to solve social problems. He again justifies territorial growth through imperialism by emphasizing on the need for "this powerful race [to] move down upon Mexico, down upon Central and South America, out upon the islands of the sea, over upon Africa and beyond. And can any one doubt that the results of this competition of races will be the "survival of the fittest?"". His goal is to promote and justify expansion of Anglo Saxon prosperity and power through means of territorial expansion and global westernization.
I disagree with Natalie when she says that she does "not believe that he was racist because the actual definition of racism is hatred towards another group of people and Strong never puts another group down and he does not have hatred towards another group of people." I think that although Strong does not openly put down another race, his overall intentions are clear. He beats around the bush a lot! I think he is racist, not through putting down another race, but by his elevation of the Anglo Saxon race
According to William Berge's "voices of imperialism",Strong "recognized the destiny of the United States on the North American continent. To this he added a doctrine of world mission, which he closely intertwined with a theory of race supremacy". When a race is inferred as superior to another, this is an obvious aspect of racism. I therefore disagree with everyone who has declared Strong not to be a racist. He promotes the Anglo-Saxon supremacy! He is imperialistic and ethnocentric therefore he is doubtfully racist.He said that mixed races such as the Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, and Anglo-Saxons had always been superior to pure races. This claim does not, however, remove him from the "racist" class; he qualified his stand somewhat by adding that the "new blood" brought into the United States would largely be the same elements which make up the Anglo-Saxon mixture and, therefore, the general type would be preserved
Reverend Josiah Strong's overall message was about the fact that Anglo-Saxons had a greater dominance in the United States than it ever had in Europe and the world combined. It had grown to a factor that was at an alarming rate compared to before the United States was discovered and established. He strongly believed that there were more accomplishments in the United States that can account for more than anything compared to what had already been accomplished in Europe. The continual spread of the race from Europe and out west to America leads to the spreading of imperialistic thoughts and actions.
I wouldn't consider Strong to be a racist on the basis that he is only glorifying the Anglo-Saxon race above all. He does not specifically mention discriminations towards other races.
He believes that because there is no longer any more land to take over and rule, that the Anglo-Saxons in the United States are to rule the whole world due to the "survival of the fittest," seeing that they are the strongest of all because of many things such as their natural resources.
I agree with lil chris in the fact that Strong's motivations are to extend missionary activity in the American west.
I also agree with james owns you in the fact that Strong is only praising the Anglo-Saxon race. It is true that he hints at the diversity in the race by stating that it is "mixed" instead of "pure".
Josiah Strong's overall message about Anglo-Saxon superioty is that they should embrace the fact that they are a "better" fit race. Also, due to their superioty and their domination due to increasing numbers of population, they should act and be respected as such. In my opinion Strong would be considered a racist due to the fact that he believes that those of Anglo-Saxon descent and those with ancestors from Europe are more superior than those of mixed cultures. He isn't totally putting down a race, but he is stating reasons why his race is more superior than another. This method could have possibly brought along many followers because people are attracted things that make one appear glourious. He also states that they have made America what it is today, which is not true. They contributed to the country's diverse cultures but they did not make this country what it is. "There the union of Church and State tends strongly to paralyze some of the members of the body of Christ." With this quote, it shows that some of his main motivations were to make people feel comfortable with both government and the way they praise. Just because one person believes one way about their religion and another about the government, doesn't mean that they have to be looked down upon. As a representative of the Protestant Church some of his goals were to let it be known that God had supposively chose their race to be in charge of the world and that missionary work would help to sprread about his message of Protestant religious beliefs.
I disagree with [kobe17] with their statement of, "In my opinion, Strong is NOT a racist because, unlike racist people, Strong does not support a particular race." Strong may not completely support one race but in his statements it quotes, Herbert Spencer says: "One great result is, I think, tolerably clear. From biological truths it is to be inferred that the eventual mixture of the allied varieties of the Aryan race, forming the population, will produce a more powerful type of man than has hitherto existed, and a type of man more plastic, more adaptable, more capable of undergoing the modifications needful for complete social life." This means Aryans are bascially what makes the world go round, withouth them the world wouldn't be as great as it is without them being "blessed" on this earth.
I totally agree with [obviouslymatt]with his statement,"So technically he wasn't racist, just a little narrow minded." This is very true and I really liked the word choice "narrow-minded", it gives an almost accurate descrpition of Strong based on his beliefs.
Josiah Strong’s main emphasis is to preserve the Anglo Saxon Race as a whole. He believes that the Anglo-Saxon race is a model race from God. He thinks that Anglo-Saxons are the race of the future. I believe that Josiah is racist in the fact that he believes that one race is superior over others, but he also promotes the expansion of missionary movement, and states that races should be cleansed through the use of religious beliefs.
I agree with LilChris in trying to end racial conflict.
Strong's overall message is that the Anglo-Saxon race is superior than that of the people of Europe, and the rest of the world. However, he conveys his message in a "polite" way, arguing that the Anglo-Saxon race has the support of God behind it, and it is for the good of the world that its superiority is preserved within the United States, and is spread to other nations.
Although Josiah Strong is not openly hostile to other races (such as Adolf Hitler), I still consider him to be racist for the fact he considers one race to dominate others. All the different cultures of the world contribute to America's success, not soley because of the Anglo-Saxons (as Strong argues), for the United States is made up of all different races from all over the world.
In my opinion, Strong promotes this message mainly because he truley does believe that the Anglo-Saxon race alone can spread spiritual Christianity and civil liberty. As a representative of the Protestant church, his motivation for writing this pamphlet is to convince the world that Anglo-Saxons are superior to other races, therefore the rest of the world should abide by its success.
1. I think his overall message was that the Anglo-Saxon race was the "superior" race. They are responsible for the world's future and to be peace keepers for the other races.
2. I wouldn't completely consider Strong a racist because he is saying that the Anglo-Saxon race is more dominant but he isn't saying that the others are weaker.
3. I think that some of his motives were to help push for imperialism and the dominance of the Anglo-Saxon race.
Oh and this is William Anongdeth From Period 3
james owns you:]
I disagree with James in that Strong is hinting that a mixed race is stronger than a pure race. Strong clearly states through all his arguments that the Anglo-Saxon race is superior over all others. He only states that immigration is welcome into America in order to help it prosper as a nation. He does not mention "mingling" between races. I believe Strong takes on the same perspective as Adolf Hitler, only politer (without the mass massacres).
hend
I agree with Hend that Strong justifies his point of view by stating that “our aristocracy, unlike that of Europe, is open to all comers. Wealth, position, influence, are prizes offered for energy; and every farmer's boy, every apprentice and clerk, every friendless and penniless immigrant, is free to enter the lists”. However, I still believe that no single race dominates the others, especially in America, where the definition of the United States illustrates to all a nation of different races.
Strong's overall message was that the Anglo-Saxon race was meant to dominate the other races. This shows that strong is a racist because he promotes how the Anglo-Saxon's have a right to impearialize because of their racial superiority. One of his motivations would be the spread of the protestant church. Another would be Social Darwinism and how that promotes racism.
I disagree with mikeb because Strong is a racist. His comments on the Anglo-Saxon race hint towards racist beliefs.
I agree with JayAguilar86 when he says that Strong's goals as a representative to the Protestant church come from the use of religious beliefs to cure social conflicts.
Josiah Strong was a dominant leader of the Social Darwinist movement. Strong's overall message was to show that the Anglo Saxon race was the superior race to all the others. He promoted expansionism and imperialism across the world. I believe almost weeshabangxd else in the fact that i dont think that he is a racist because he want to mix the races so that they would become superior. His main motivation was to promote reconclilitation to end racial conflict and to support his message were his promotions to extend domestic missionary activity in the American West which was said by lil chris.
I feel that Josiah Strong's main point is that the Anglo-Saxon race is the superior race of all. He says that they are the dominant race and that they out number the minority, also imperialism is used to show that the race is expanding the commerce in the world. I would have to agree with patelz2000 said on racism. Because Strong never actaully put down any other races, he just focused on the idea that his race was superior to all others never stating anything bad about other races involved. Id have to agree with Christi815 about Strongs motivations in that he wanted to extend missionary activity to the west as a way to try and influence otehrs to be more like the Anglo-Saxons who were "the fittest to survive."
I feel that Reverend Strong is stating that the Anglo-Saxon race is the majority in the U.S. He claims that mixed races are more superior than pure ones. He is there to show how the Anglo Saxons expanded the world and he uses imperialism to show it. I would not consider him a racist, because he does not discriminate aganist the Anglo Saxons. He is just telling about how they are good for the U.S. He is trying to end racial problems, so how would that make him a racist. I feel that he is just a man with a good idea. His motivations that support his message is the idea of Social Darwinism. The Anglo Saxons are a result of natural selection. Therefore, they were the ones to emigrate to the West rather than the Europeans.
I agree with raiders10 when they said that Strong was not racist because he did not put down any other races.
I also disagree with righteousprofet because they feel that since Strong only talked about the Anglo Saxons he is racist, when he just stating his opinon about them.
omg mr wise my internet stopped working for a while so i will have a note tommorw morning but here is my blog
amethyst aka bonquiqui
i believe that reverend josiah felt that the Angolo-saxons was a race wo should be kept superior and that they should be the highest because with them being the higheset they helped expand and promote imperialism because of the fact that a mixed race is better than one of one ethnicity. Josiah also believes that the angolo-saxons were from natural selection and that with them emigrating,God is with them.also like what chris said, "Strong vitalized the end to racial conflict in his book, "Our Country: Its' possible future and Its Present Crisis". Strong's motivation lies within Darwin's Social Darwinisim" .I dont believe that josiah is a rascist becaue although he is puttting a race as superrior, rascism involves ignorance and intolerance and he has nothing to do with either of it. I also agree with noshan newr with the statement that "His main motivation was to promote reconclilitation to end racial conflict and to support his message"
Reverend Josiah Strong emphasizes the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race within the U.S because of the spirituality of Christianity and civil liberty, the two factors that elevate the human race,. The overall message was mostly explaining the dominance of the Anglo-Saxon race and how it was benifical to the mother country. He believed that they began as the minority yet over the years have begun to grow tremendously due to impearlism. In my opinion I do not
believe that Strong is racist due to the fact the he does not specifically put down one race. He does though only talk about the Anglo-Saxon race and how they are superior because he believe that a hybrid race is better than a pure race, which shows that he isnt racist because if he was he would think mixed races are better than pure. Also in his message there is no hostility shown to other races. One of Strong's motivation was his duty to promote the idea of expanding the territory of the United States to show the power of America. As he was a representative of the Protestant Church, he also makes it his goal by colonizing areas for missionaries with a goal to expand the influence of Christianity.(:
I agree with lil chris when he says
that Strongs motivations that support his message are his promotions to extend domestic missionary activity in the American West and to solve social ills through protestant religious principles. I also agree with veg_girl09 that Strong does put the Anglo-Saxon race upon a pedestal and talks about how great his race is, but he never talks bad about any other race.
-Mallory (:
Yooo! Mister Wiseman, i know this is kinda late but i had forgotten my password since its been so long since the last blog.
oh, anywhooooo this is Ronny by the way.
Joseph Strong's main message is that the Anglo Saxon race is superior and any others are inferior to it. Also, he supports imperialsm by stating that democracy should spread all across the world. He shows to be patriotic in nature, but not a racist. Strong had never discriminated against any other races, so i believe that it is more of a political ideal than that of a racial issue.
lil chris: i agree with the idea his book encouraged and sparked missionary activity.
kobe17: i agree with the socaial darwinism idea that he points out, which emphasizes the superiority of American people to the concept of "survival of the fittest."
Strong's message is to preserve the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race within the U.S.I believe that Strong is not an extreme racist because he dose not seem to have anything against other races. However, he believes that mixed races are much more superior to pure ones, witch makes Strong's racism views debatable. He would support his message by his views to end conflicts that have to do with race. His goals as a representative of the Protestant church would have to do with the expansion of westward missionary moments as well as to use religious beliefs to cure social clashes.
i agree with jayaguilar86 and mondile that Strong was not an extreme racist.
1)Josiah Strong is saying that Anglo-Saxons should be in control because the of the population of this group.
2)Yes and no. Yes because he wants one certain race to have domination. No because his dominate race included any one that could speak english.
3)His moativations are that the Anglo-Saxons had a large amount of people.He wanted the people to be christian
MPH
The base of Strong's overall message is the preservation of the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon race within the U.S. spread from Europe. He continues to support his theory that the Anglo-Saxons are outnumbering the minority and is always continuing to grow, thus expanding the idea of imperialism across America. In a sense, racism is defined by hatred or intolerance of another race or other races. While Strong glorified the Anglo-Saxons, he never mentioned discrimination towards other race. He did not specificially looked down upon the minority races in his eyes, he just emphasized the Anglo-Saxon's and their significance upon this Earth.
I agree with Aditya and Jay on the idea of the westward movement as one of Strong's movement.
I believe Strong's Overall message was is basically that Anglo-Saxons are to rule the earth and run everything. I would consider Strong as non-racist because he doesn't single-out my particular race. The motivations Strong would have to promote his message saying, "the survival of the fittest" (using the Charles Darwin idea to get his point across to the rest of the Americans. With the idea of the "the survival of the fittest," they would no longer have any more land to take over and rule, so the Anglo-Saxons in the U.S. are to rule the world seeing that they are the strongest of all because of many things such as their natural resources.
interesting af bots <3
interesting af bots <3
Hi
Post a Comment